Like my blog!? Bookmark it!

Do We Need to Study Theory of TOC!?

So it’s here – the day most of the class has been hoping never came – the day to put the Theory of Computation into practice.


As one of our teachers is gracious enough to quote in class every now and then, "In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is." Which makes it all the more confusing – does it imply that even if I study theory, I won’t be able to implement it in practice as both are different in practice!?

Another quote to substantiate this by Falk Bruegmann, “In theory, that's science. But in reality, science is sometimes practiced differently.”

I think our teacher would agree with Robert Grossblatt's variation, “Theory and reality are only theoretically related.” Which implies we need to study theory to pass the exam.

But in the words of Trygve Reenskaug from the University of Oslo, "In theory, practice is simple." So cheers buddies, the exam paper would be easy tomorrow… But then again, Alexandre Boily says, "But, is it simple to practice theory?" No need to ask us..

Loads of confusion but I guess we can follow Jan van de Snepscheut, a Dutch Mathematician, who says, "It may come out all right in practice, but it'll never work in theory!" This quote sounds highly relevant in our context – things never work out in theory for us (at least for me), but it should work out in practice when we sit in the exam hall tomorrow. So what’s the need to study theory, wasting hours of precious time?

And last but not the least, I think our quote (at least mine) would go something like this, “All I care about is passing this exam. I've lost the ability to discern theory from practice.”

8 comments:

This's theoritically practical n practically theoritical :P

 

@Raviteja.. Theoretically practical sounds better to me. We don't need to study theory since it's practical - we can worry about the practice once the exam starts :D

 

nice but in place of writing this u should post some solutions of questions given to us..

 

@Balram.. LOLz... If I had the merest inclination of doing that, I wouldn't have written this :P

 

hey luks like Balram has got sm point ...

i think probably theory was a way to describe practice ..bt through the time course the practice of theory has got itself into
'meta-theory' ....

anywy all the above stuff has left my brain box baffled so its better i give it good time to recover ...

 

@Vinayak.. Basically I've no intentions of studying all the books (or rather even one book), so if even one theory proves that theory (I wonder if a theory can prove the redundancy of another theory) is redundant in the presence of practice, I'm more than glad :D

 

Thatz what happens b4 the exams :P

People go all crazy and they decide they must write something about theory and practice. Much ado about nothing in particular.

 

@Mainak.. Better to go crazy without studying than going insane after studying theory :D

 

Post a Comment